Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dina's avatar

Your research is helpful. I’ve been using Proofademic lately and it’s been the most consistent detector I’ve tested, especially for academic writing. It rarely flags human work incorrectly and still catches lightly rewritten AI content that other tools miss. Would be curious how it compares to your top 3.

GeorgieCher's avatar

Quillbot isn't reliable. I pasted in several paragraphs of text that I wrote years ago (pre-AI), and it identified them as 87% AI-generated. GPT Zero, which is what I have been using recently, identified it as 100% human. No comment on Winston AI as I have to pay to paste.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?